The given table depicts the data of digital devices, namely phone and computer, whih were owned by a thoudsand of people in 6 separate regions last 19 years.
It is clear that the residents in a small Europe country, which is called "Luxemburg" hold the largest figure of both mobile phones and PC totally. It can also be seen that city-dwellers bought more mobiles than computers in all enlisted countries.
According to the table, it was calculated that a majority of phones and PC were owned by Luxemburg's residents, which were 872 and 900 respectively. In contrast, only a small fraction of both devices were afforded by Chinese, which was only 35 in phones and 88 in the rest tool. Further more, South Korea is the fifth-highest devices' consumed country in the table, which was recorded 380 and 452 in the given order.
Looking at the same table, Italy is the second-highest country which contains the technological residents, and it was surveyed that 737 phones and 480 computers were bought by Italian. It is noticeable that Singapore is the only country which has the data of sold phones and PC remain stable, 684 phones and 690 PCs in particular. The remaining 586 smartphones and 452 laptops are allocated for 1000 German population in 2003, make it the third-least figure in the rectangle-shaped table.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, third, well, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97757847534 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02434370887 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8925546846 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10834587451 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466615004105 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246650059526 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694586583817 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272823701272 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.