the table shows the questionnaire about the opinions of club members and general public for a new theater in one town in 2012
The data table makes a comparison of the opinions of club members and the general public in three different aspects for a new theatre in a particular town in 2012. Overall, most citizens have optimistic views and experiences about the theatre, with excellent assessments being the most typical.
A large share of club members and the general public (72% and 64%) felt excellent about the theatre’s facilities, while 2% of the former and 8% of the latter said those were poor. In terms of the questionnaire asking about the information, notable figures for negative opinions were registered in both subjects, which were 16% and 14% respectively.
The vast majority (88%) of the club members felt excellent about the quality of the theatre, while the figure for that of the general public only constituted approximately half (53%). It is also noticeable that the percentage of the general public feeling pleased and assessing poor surpassed the club members’ statistics. In detail, an estimated 40% of public citizens gave a satisfying opinion, and 7% did not appreciate the quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the depth of snow cm in a particular ski resort in Canada in three individual years 73
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 73
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...of the opinions of club members and the general public in three different aspects for a new th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... A large share of club members and the general public 72% and 64% felt excellent about the th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...eatre, while the figure for that of the general public only constituted approximately half 53%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...o noticeable that the percentage of the general public feeling pleased and assessing poor surp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88141576628 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0713225941 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41039679713 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176612210831 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121658359558 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269916058744 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484424190696 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.