The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that humans are stepping into the era of cultural and economic integration. In light of this, the flourishing of multinational companies and the surge in globalization have become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although this phenomenon might have some disadvantage, I would argue that the expansion will offer citizens a job market and better living standards.
Some people give a reason why the extension of multinational companies and globalization produce a negative impact. An advocate of this opinion might argue that this increase causes the loss of local identity. This is because that approach to new cultural flows, habits and practices of people would be influenced and steadily changed. As Asia is one of the ideal areas for Western countries to expand their range of activities, Asians in modern days are much more open and open-minded in lifestyle compared to heavy traditional values in the past. However, this concern also brings optimistic values as it contributes to the progress of the concept towards the gender inequality.
In my opinion, the expansion of multinational corporations and the increase in globalization offer people many potential benefits. This is because unemployment can be addressed since more job opportunities are available. Since international firms open in other countries, a higher demand for the workforce is required to run the production lines, machines and business. In addition, citizens’ living standards can also meet improvements. Joining in integration and allowing companies to locate their branches in the country can facilitate the governments to build sustainable diplomatic relationships with other nations. Therefore developing mutual trust and being aided with investments in many fields, such as the economy, medical industry, education and technology.
In conclusion, although the loss of cultural identity might be a concern among people, according to what has been analyzed above, I am convinced that the impacts of the flourishing of job opportunities and better living standards would surpass the negative influence and offer citizens potential promises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transport 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 78
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 67
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...matic relationships with other nations. Therefore developing mutual trust and being aided...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, as for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60975609756 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13165412917 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1140109262 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111509218606 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396365035479 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615129616503 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643758560913 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023955831292 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.