The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares 7 leading mobile phone manufactures in term of their shares of the global market in 2005 and 2006.
Overall, Nokia had the largest market share in both 2005 and 2006. While the percentage of most of companies fell between 2005 and 2006, that of Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson increased.
Nokia was the leader in the global mobile phone market in 2005 and 2006. While the share of this brand stood at 32.5% in 2005, it rose by 2.5% to 35% in 2006. Concerning market shares of Motorola and Sony Ericsson, while the former rose significantly from 17.7% in 2005 to 21.1% in 2006, there only was a slight increase by 1.1% from 6.3% in 2005 to 7.4% in 2006 in share of the latter.
In contrast, Samsung, LG, BenQ Mobile and others witnessed a downward trend in their market share between 2005 and 2006. While the share of Samsung and LG fell slightly by 0.9% and 0.4% respectively, BenQ Mobile’s market share dropped by over a half from 4.9% in 2005 to 2.4% in 2006. The ratio of people using the others cell phone brand also fell significantly from 19.2% in 2005 to 16.2% in 2006.
- In some countries parents expect children to spend long time studying in and after school and have less free time Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and society that they live in 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'phone' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'phones'.
Suggestion: phones
The table compares 7 leading mobile phone manufactures in term of their shares of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the companies') or simply say ''most companies''.
Suggestion: most of the companies; most companies
... 2005 and 2006. While the percentage of most of companies fell between 2005 and 2006, that of Nok...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... in 2006. The ratio of people using the others cell phone brand also fell significantl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.565 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29559905036 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0943366363 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316181145155 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179122777758 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839222690973 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242370707563 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657043773323 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.