The tables below give information about the amount of beer and fruit juice consumed per person per year in different cities.
In different nations, beer as well as fruit juice which consumed by individuals per year that are described in the given table.
It is clear that, beer was consumed by the person as comparatively more than fruit juice. Additionally, Ireland consumed beer more than Finland. Apart from, fruit juice was taken of less amount by New Zealand than Canada.
To begin with, Belgium and Denmark drank beer the same amount of liters by 98 liters per year. Furthermore, around 80 liters and more than those liters of beer were consumed per person per annum in Netherland, the US, and Australia respectively. What is more, the highest amount of beer over 100 liters that were consumed by Ireland, Germany, and Austria, 115 liters, 119 liters, 106 liters respectively. Apart from, Finland also consumed 1 liter less than Netherland.
On the other hand, fruit juice was consumed by Canada with the highest amount by 52.6 liters, whereas the US consumed 10 liters less than Canada. Apparently, in the five countries, fruit juice was taken up more than 30 liters and these all were nearly accounted by the amount of liters. However, the UK, Netherlands, and New Zealand where consumed fruit juice with the lowest amount of 29.3 liters, 28.1 liters, and nearly 25 liters respectively within twelve months.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 67
- prevention tan cure out of country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measure to what extent do you agree or diagree 73
- some people say that the more a product is advertised the more a product will buy it to what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- prevention is better than cure out of the country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and prevention measures to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the diagram below shows how a mechanical arm works and how the joints that make up the arm function in the same way as those in a human arm summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, apart from, as well as, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01388888889 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51534641602 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4744588374 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0909090909 5.23603664747 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296468867556 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143394542374 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792178880296 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222711561908 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727384339273 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.