The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant
The graphs compare the statistics of coffee and banana Fairtrade sales in 1999 and 2004 among five different European countries. Overall, it is obvious that Fairtrade-labeled coffee sales increased in all five countries while banana sales witnessed the rise in only three countries. In addition, in the UK and Switzerland, the sales of coffee and bananas both had significant growth.
It is clear in the tables that Fairtrade-labeled coffee sales climbed up in all five countries. The UK market witnessed the most radical change when the coffee sales rocketed to 20 million of euros in 2004, compared to only 1.9 million of euros in 1999. The rise in the Sweden market is the least significant when it only soared from 0.8 million of euros in 1999 to 1 million in 2004.
On the other hand, the banana sales among the five European countries share a more fluctuating trend. Three countries which are Switzerland, the UK and Belgium showed the increase in sales, with Switzerland having the most drastic surge from 15 million of euros in 1999 to 47 million in 2004. All the while, Sweden and Denmark had their numbers sunk with Denmark showing a more dramatical plunge from 2 millions of euros in 1999 to 0.8 million in 2004.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 81
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...hange when the coffee sales rocketed to 20 millions of euros in 2004, compared to only 1.9 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
...ns of euros in 2004, compared to only 1.9 millions of euros in 1999. The rise in the Sweden m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... significant when it only soared from 0.8 millions of euros in 1999 to 1 millions in 2004. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...rland having the most drastic jump from 15 millions of euros in 1999 to 47 millions in 2004. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...k showing a more dramatical plunge from 2 millions of euros in 1999 to 0.8 millions in 2004. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89523809524 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79477971418 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447619047619 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4481741015 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205389613252 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1135219544 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576174591452 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159050929817 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542286011181 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.