The tables give information about age, income, and poverty population in 3 states in USA in 2000
The table compares the statistics of population variation by age, income, and poverty among three states in the USA in 2000. Overall, Florida had the oldest population, California had the highest income, and Utah had the highest percentage of people under the poverty line.
From the graph, it is clear that the rate of people under 18 in Florida was the lowest among the three states, with 22.7% of the population, while people over 65 years old in Florida accounted for approximately 17.6%. On the other hand, Utah had the youngest population, with the proportion of people under 18 being 32.2% in perspective with 8.5% for people over 65 years old.
In terms of annual income, California earned the most money in 2000 with $22,711 of total income but possessed the highest rate of people under the poverty line, which accounted for roughly 14.2% of the population. Conversely, Utah had the lowest annual income, with only $18.185, but the proportion of people under the poverty line in Utah was only 9.4% of the population.
- The tables give information about age income and poverty population in 3 states in USA in 2000 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair trade coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 81
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8908045977 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49592745312 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477011494253 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9333497053 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.833333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127470781675 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973962408966 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147164108526 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108972015975 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100359035401 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.