The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

The tables provide the details of the European countries (UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden) about the procurement of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in the year 1999 and 2004. The number of sales are in euros.

Overall, coffee sales were increased for all the 5 European countries when compared to the previous period. In contrast, the procurement of bananas was rose only for 3 countries except for Sweden and Denmark.

To begin, the coffee sales for the UK in 1999 was accounted for 1.5 millions of euros and after 4 years it increased more than 18.5 million than the last 4 years. In 1999, 3 millions of euros of coffee sales in Switzerland and in 2004 sales were rose to 100% more. Both Denmark and Sweden coffee sales were gently rose to 0.2 million in 2004 while in 1999, 1.8 and 0.8 million sales respectively. The coffee sales in Belgium started at 1 million and later 4 years it moved to 1.7 million.

On the other hand, sales of bananas of Switzerland were remained highest among the other countries with 15 million in 1999 and even after 4 years, it remains in the top position with 47 millions of sales. The number of bananas sales in Belgium and the UK was gradually increased to 4 and 5.5 millions of euros in the year 2004 where in 1999 it was 0.6 and 1 million only. With the exception of Sweden and Denmark, sales sank to 1 and 0.9 millions of euros in the year 2004 from 1.8 and 2 million in 1999.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-01 trpg143 56 view
2023-11-16 phamquanghmu 73 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-11-11 Daniel3003 67 view
Essays by user rohitbangari27… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
... for the UK in 1999 was accounted for 1.5 millions of euros and after 4 years it increased mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...million than the last 4 years. In 1999, 3 millions of euros of coffee sales in Switzerland an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ark and Sweden coffee sales were gently rose to 0.2 million in 2004 while in 1999, 1...
^^^^
Line 13, column 184, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...rs, it remains in the top position with 47 millions of sales. The number of bananas sales in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of sales. The number of bananas sales in Belgium and the UK was gradually increas...
^^
Line 13, column 292, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...e UK was gradually increased to 4 and 5.5 millions of euros in the year 2004 where in 1999 it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: Except; Except for
... in 1999 it was 0.6 and 1 million only. With the exception of Sweden and Denmark, sales sank to 1 and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 438, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
...eden and Denmark, sales sank to 1 and 0.9 millions of euros in the year 2004 from 1.8 and 2 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, except for, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56704980843 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5303431556 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406130268199 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4667347633 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.363636364 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29627070685 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150216341236 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977351016176 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234791976898 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120278131614 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.