The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables compare five European nations in terms of sales of Fairtrade coffee and bananas in the years 1999 and 2004.
Overall, the UK and Switzerland had the highest sales of Fairtrade coffee and bananas in both years. It is noticeable that all five European countries saw increases in the turnover of coffee, sales of bananas only rose in three countries.
In 1999, sales of Fairtrade coffee in the UK were 1.5 million euros, and the figure for Switzerland stood at 3 million euros. After the following five years, the UK saw a significant increase to 20 million euros, and Switzerland’s sales of Fairtrade coffee rose to 6 million euros in the same year. In 2004, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden saw slight increases in sales of coffee to 2 million euros or below.
Looking at the sales of Fairtrade bananas, we can see that the UK had the largest sales, more than figures for the four other countries combined, at 15 million euros in 1999. Switzerland and Denmark had sales of Fairtrade bananas at 1 and 0.6 million euros in that year. By 2004, the sales of this commodity had risen to 47, 5.5 and 4 million euros in the UK, Switzerland and Denmark respectively, while Belgium and Sweden saw a different trend, the turnover of Fairtrade bananas dropped to only 1 million euros or lower.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73451327434 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6285867388 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455752212389 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.988046812 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321769900691 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18495395101 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108893459421 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27665251016 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124816120763 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.