The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables show the money spent on Fairtrade coffee and bananas in two different years in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden.
It is clear that there were significant increases in sales of Fairtrade coffee in all five European countries between 1999 and 2004, while only three countries rose their turnover of Fairtrade bananas. Overall, the UK had the considerable higher sales of both commodities.
In 1999, Switzerland had the highest sales of Fairtrade coffee, with 3 million euros, while the turnover from coffee in the UK stood at 1.5 million euros. However, by 2004, the sales of Fairtrade coffee in the UK had risen considerably to 20 million euros, and the figure for Switzerland was just 6 million euros. The year 2004 also saw dramatic increases in sales of bananas in the two countries, by 32 and 4.5 million euros respectively.
The sales of both commodities were lower in three other countries. In 2004, there were increases in the money spent on Fairtrade coffee, but sales still were at 2 million euros or below in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden. It is noticeable that sales from Fairtrade bananas dropped to 1 million euro or lower in Belgium and Sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6984995831 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.023028763 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307221494486 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135959645087 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080253829483 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198942449357 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661537365956 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.