The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five european countries.

The tables compare the expenditure in various countries in Europe on two Fairtrade products: Bananas and coffee between 1999 and 2004. The general trend gives an idea of increasing growing of Fairtrade-labelled products with UK and Switzerland being in the lead. Additional the fastest growth seems to have happened in the UK in the sale of fairtrade coffee.

Whereas the market in the UK have witnessed a larger growth of Fairtrade coffee, from 1.5 million euros to 20 millions, than the bananas which only increased nearly five folds from 1 million to 5.5 millions, fairtrade bananas in the market had a higher rise in Switzerland, doubling, and Belgium, rising to four folds of their 1999’s sales. Conversely Sweden markets showed a decline for 1.8 to 1 million in selling fairtrade bananas and hardly any difference in coffee sales. The case was practically similar in Denmark with bananas in 2004 making half the profit they made in 1999 and a negligible increase of 200,000 euros in coffee sales.

That shows that there is a variety of how well fairtrade is doing in the markets around Europe, although it is quite obvious that coffee is overall performing better than bananas.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... four folds of their 1999's sales. Conversely Sweden markets showed a decline for 1.8...
^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'if', 'well', 'whereas']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253456221198 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.129032258065 0.116061578633 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.073732718894 0.0759168565197 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0322580645161 0.0366838410393 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0138248847926 0.0131127313244 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.165898617512 0.155750635184 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0506912442396 0.0379272487307 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75698831942 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0230414746544 0.0210936926555 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101382488479 0.0948980150116 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00921658986175 0.00967000014798 95% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1192.0 1161.00487805 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.9 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0202020202 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.419191919192 0.337110787985 124% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29797979798 0.247514529752 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156565656566 0.171178102325 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126262626263 0.112407865282 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75698831942 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.546246751206 108% => OK
Word variations: 55.7597962003 49.3433353143 113% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 28.2857142857 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2624362558 42.9750493124 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.285714286 135.714022679 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.689975730869 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 58.0836940837 47.7609492067 122% => OK
Elegance: 2.68421052632 2.94281807926 91% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484038778794 0.418131533498 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.202012801177 0.181151798455 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08408046696 0.0850326197045 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.749529707903 0.706616315825 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.125738297202 0.157042692854 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.282896197224 0.228904883108 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10167199878 0.108899403657 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.35868417473 0.367819155151 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.195240695816 0.0812612215331 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324351246499 0.316326947829 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162114659804 0.0921553760075 176% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.