The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided tables illustrate the world population and its regional distribution from 1950 to 2000, with a prediction for 2050.
Overall, it is clear that the global population tends to increase throughout the period. In addition, there is a projection for an upward trend in terms of population distribution in most continents, except Europe and North America, while Asia is expected to have the largest distribution of population in the world.
As per the first table, the number of the worldwide population stood at 2.5 billion in 1950, while the population figures saw a marked rise to 6 billion over 50 years. And it is forecasted to reach a record-high population, of 9 billion in 2050. According to the second table, around 22% of European living in the world, while Asia accounted for more than half of the total of 2.5 billion people in 1950. In 2000, Asia continued to rank as the top population in the world, comprising three-fifths of the world population, compared to a sharp decline in terms of the number of European residents, at 12%. And the figure for Europe is predicted to decrease continuously to 7%. In comparison, the distribution of the population in Asia decrease slightly and is anticipated to be just 59% in 2050.
Looking at another region, an increasing trend is seen in the case of North America (7 to 4%), whereas in Latin America and Oceania, it is expected to stabilize at 9 and 1% respectively. Finally, in Africa where the population is projected to make up one-fifth of the global population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Candice987 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Đặng Luân | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Rajan wahla | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie charts below show the greenhouse gas emissions for last year by sector for Australia and New Zealand Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87356321839 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99332551709 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2200118158 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.636363636 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208559015552 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828083661512 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679970812708 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145334092333 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667311056092 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.