Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people, like the homeless and unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that while their local disadvantaged people are homeless and unemployed, governments should not put money into international aid. From my perspective, I completely disagree with this view and I believe that spending money on international assistance can be better.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government should spend money on problems such as homeless and unemployed. Firstly, if the government only spends on international aid without worrying about other issues like unemployment or homelessness. This can make residents become tougher and make the population of a nation decrease. In addition, the economy of a nation can dwindle because of a lack of labor resources. In contrast, if government concentrate on providing for other problems like homeless and unemployed, this can help develop the standard of resident and make the country develop. Hence, focusing on other serious issues can make a nation develop significantly.
On the other hand, I believe that government should not spend money on international aid when there are many problems not tackled like homeless or unemployed. To begin with, if the government of a nation spends money on international assistance, it will have more help from other nations. Moreover, other nations can be helped for a nation developing economy or politics. Especially, this can also sustain the relationship between countries and there will not have any war. For example, the USA is one of the nations providing the vaccine for Vietnam to prevent the Covid-19 epidemic and this makes the relationship between Vietnam and USA sustained. Secondly, international aid can help government solve many problems in a nation such as homeless or unemployed problems, and have more help from other nations. Overall, spending money on international assistance can bring more benefits to development and helpings for a country from other nations.
In conclusion, although spending money on helping disadvantaged people, like the homeless and unemployed can make a nation develop, it seems to me that spending money on international aid can have a nation develop.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38208955224 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08439254784 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429850746269 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8035629935 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6875 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267905117651 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114751117397 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10977076751 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21848303444 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754873116787 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.