The tables below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people club members and the general public who showed their opinions about a new theatre Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and make comparisons whe

Essay topics:

The tables below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people
(club members and the general public) who showed their opinions about a new
theatre. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and
make comparisons where relevant.

The three tables compare the responses of club members and general public regarding a new theatre. It can be seen that the responses were similar in some matters and different in others.
When asked about the production quality of the theatre, almost similar number (70% and 67%) of club members and general public respectively gave the rating as excellent. 17% and 18% respectively of both groups opined that production quality was satisfactory and almost equal number (13% and 15%) rated it as poor.
Regarding information about the plays and performances to the public, 72% and 88% club members and general public rated it as excellent; 23% and 10% respectively rated it satisfactory, whereas only a small minority of each group (5% and 2%) rated it as poor. As to the facilities of the theatre, three quarters of the club members rated the facilities as excellent, as opposed to only 55% of the general public. 23% and 19% club members and general public respectively rated the facilities as satisfactory. However, the biggest discrepancy can be seen in those, who rated the facilities as poor. 26% of general public were very dissatisfied with the club facilities and rated it as poor where as only 2% of the club members thought so.
Overall, the proportion of those giving excellent or satisfactory rating in each criterion was higher than of those giving a ‘poor’ rating.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (29 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...mpare the responses of club members and general public regarding a new theatre. It can be seen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... number 70% and 67% of club members and general public respectively gave the rating as excelle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he public, 72% and 88% club members and general public rated it as excellent; 23% and 10% resp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...xcellent, as opposed to only 55% of the general public. 23% and 19% club members and general p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...al public. 23% and 19% club members and general public respectively rated the facilities as sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ho rated the facilities as poor. 26% of general public were very dissatisfied with the club fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...he club facilities and rated it as poor where as only 2% of the club members thought so....
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83795868232 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5906369582 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177963442052 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935917628598 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709280230435 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106387192296 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709292225991 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.