The tale below gives information about management positions help by women in European country in 2006.
The table compares the percentage of women in holding the management place in finance, manufacturing, IT, hospitality industries in the year 2006.
As an overview, it was be seen clearly that hospitality has the highest proportion in managing places, while manufacturing had the lowest rate in 2006
As we can see clearly in the table, the percentage of women held the managers accounted for about one-third in hospitality industry. This industry also had the highest proportion of executives and CEOs by female, both was at about one-fifth of the total in 2006. Both finance and IT had the percentage of women in managers were about 16%, but the executive and CEOs in Finance were lower than IT, they were just at 4,58% in Executive and 1.98% in CEOs, while IT was at 12,82% in executive and 6,58% in CEOs. Finally, accounting the lowest proportion in three positions was manufacturing industry, with 9% in managers and under 2% in the other positions in 2006
- the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes 73
- the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes 73
- The table below gives information about the economic value of international students in US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows change in the number of international students from three countries in two of those years 87
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is waste of money. government must invest ths money in public service instead. to what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- The pie chart show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...the year 2006. As an overview, it was be seen clearly that hospitality has the h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93865030675 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87445409709 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.348925463 43.030603864 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.25 112.824112599 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189720774189 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120582065575 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257385735279 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125944359401 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382330679297 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.26 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.