task 1: electricity
The line graph compares electricity production in France from 1980 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear from the line graph that the amount of the electricity production of nuclear experienced the most dramatic change during the research period. Additionally, while the quantity of Thermal, Hydroelectric and nuclear decreased, there was a slight increase in the number for Renewables.
In 1980, the amount of electricity production of Thermal began at about 125 TW-h and then declined dramatically to 50 TW-h in 1980, whereas the figure for Nuclear and Hydroelectric were the lowest number, at 0 TW-h at the same time in 1980. Despite some fluctuations, there was a stable remain at 50 TW-h in the figure for Thermal in 2010.
In 2010, the amount of Electricity production of Hydroelectric saw a slight decline to 50 TW-h, compared with only under 450 of Nuclear. Meanwhile, there was a slight rise, ending at about 25 TW-h of Renewables in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-29 | hoangquang | 73 | view |
- task 2: Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- task 1 never married 84
- task 1: the consumption of four different food groups 78
- task 1: the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- task 1: the birth rate 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05095541401 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98392518089 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9528091795 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101528524038 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586827360853 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553226248949 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836084246588 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352361055226 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.