Task 1:The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The charts compared the proportion of average household expenses in a nation between 1950 and 2010. It is clear that spending on healthcare was by far lowest during the research period. Additionally, the nation witnessed the most dramatic change in the rate for housing.
In 1950, the percentage of housing cost was highest, at 72.1 % of the total household expenditure, while the figure for food was significantly lower, at only 11.2%. Meanwhile, the proportion of spending on education and healthcare and education accounted for 2.4% and 6.6% respectively, compared to 3.3% of the total cost spent on transportation.
In 2010, the proportion of expenditure on food experienced a significant increase to 34%, became the highest figure in the pie chart. The figure for healthcare slightly risen to 4.5%, whereas the rate for transportation remarkably grown to 14%. By contrast, the percentage of expenditure on housing significantly decreased by roughly 50% to 22%.
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 55
- it is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can just learn much from books, films and the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- There have been many inventions in human history, such as wheel. Some people think that the most important thing is the internet. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefits more from this the community or these young people 87
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22588583835 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0697813318 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15933752319 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756011048134 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104360595592 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110002071311 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047328067583 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.