Thepie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive.The table shows how these causes affected threere gionsof the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information byselecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The below chart and table present primary sources of worldwide land degradation and how these factors affected three certain regions of the world during 1990s.
For worldwide range, it’s clear from the char that over-grazing should bear the main responsibility of land degradation, which takes up 35%. Likewise, we can see that the remaining causes land degradation is largely contributed by deforestation and over-cultivation, respectively 30% and 28%. And the rest of 7% land degradation causes are from other minor factors.
To be specific on certain regions such as North America, Europe and Oceania, the region of Europe experienced the most sever condition of land degradation, where total land degraded by 23%. Furthermore, deforestation is main cause contributing to 9.8$ of it, while over-cultivation and over-grazing took up 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. In contrast with Europe, North America had the least land degraded (5%) during 1990s with 0.2%, 3.3% and 1.5% caused by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing separately. Moreover, there was a considerable land degradation (13%) occurring in Oceania, in which over-grazing caused 11.3% of it and deforestation contributed to the rest.
In a conclusion, over-grazing and deforestation should undertake the main responsibility in causing land degradation during 1990s and there is a need for the society to be aware of the serious harm of them.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Thepie chartbelowshowsthemainreasonswhyagriculturallandbecomes lessproductive Thetableshowshowthesecausesaffectedthreeregionsof theworldduringthe 1990s Summarisetheinformationbyselectingandreportingthemainfeatures and make comparisonswhere relevant 11
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...cted three certain regions of the world during 1990s. For worldwide range, it’s clear fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$8'.
Suggestion: $8
...station is main cause contributing to 9.8$ of it, while over-cultivation and over-...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... took up 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. In contrast with Europe, North America had the leas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
... America had the least land degraded 5% during 1990s with 0.2%, 3.3% and 1.5% caused by defo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...ponsibility in causing land degradation during 1990s and there is a need for the society to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety to be aware of the serious harm of them.
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be aware of the serious harm of them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59722222222 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47728951233 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9457753489 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169332907164 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857702995469 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620925238422 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137881876512 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643727415085 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.