the three maps shows changes in the village of Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000.
The pictures depict the development of Kelsbey village in more than two centuries (from 1780 to 2000).
Overall, Kelsbey village developed in terms of public facilities and housings, and the forest area and farmland were completely converted to the buildings for a public purpose.
In 1780, the village used to be the farm and forest area, and just 100 homes were built. However, the number of houses developed in 1860 doubled. Also, the bridge crossing the river on the west side was constructed. Another change occurring was almost two-third of woods were chopped down and half of the farm was given away to be vacant land.
Kelsbey village in 2000 underwent a huge transformation. Five hundred houses were established with two roads connected to the schools in the south and river in the west. Two educational institution and three-sport centres were built in the south of the village. Furthermore, five shops were constructed along the river in the southwest, while the wetland area for the birds was added in the upstream.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-27 | Zahid6400 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | Sajib Ahamed | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-03 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | dorae | 61 | view |
- Some people think women should be allowed to join the army, the navy and the air force just like men.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- People Participate in IELTS Programs in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 67
- People participate in 6 difference English Course in pare, 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0350877193 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6851850083 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2409988825 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204708086551 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865820350512 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109011326207 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144589443883 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102213702757 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.