The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The diagram depicts information about the variation in the yearly allocation for different infrastructures required for a particular school of uk in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
In an overview, it can be noticed that a school in uk spent more of its allocated budget on teachers salary as compares to the other infrastructures in all the mentioned years.
As can be seen from the figure that, insurance which was the least allocated proportion of budget by the school in the initial year increased gradually by 4 times in the final year. Likewise, the spending for furniture and equipment increased significantly from 15% to 23%, although it dropped at 5% in the year 1991.
On the other hand, the school paid about 15% of its total money on resources such as books in the year 1981 which drooped minimally to 9% in the year 2001, although the spending reached at its peak level of 20%.As for the proportion spent for teacher salaries, the trend remained almost constant at around 50% over a given period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...k spent more of its allocated budget on teachers salary as compares to the other infrast...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ending reached at its peak level of 20%.As for the proportion spent for teacher sa...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ost constant at around 50% over a given period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, as for, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81714285714 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77324829802 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9461767821 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157406531728 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943276581369 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661297143374 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107988307956 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659198537851 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.