The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The alters of annual allotment by Someland citizens in year 1980, 1990 and 2000 is illustrated by the three supplied pie charts.
As an overview, it is ostensive that Higher Education accounted for the highest percentage of outlay every year. And although the budgets on Transportation and Environmental services increased, that of the expenses on Higher Education, K-12 Education, Health and human resources decreased.
According to the charts, it is conspicuous that the proportion of expenditure for K-12 Education, Environmental services and other demands were consistent among the period. 1990 saw a trivial reduction of 5% and 2% respectively in the outlay of K-12 Education and others and it continued to decrease in the next decades. Consequently, 18% of budget spent for K-12 Education and 1% of expenses for other demand in year 2000. In contrast, the allotment in Environmental services was grown from 4% to 9% after two decades.
However, the allocation in Higher Education, Transportation and Health and human resources show an opposing trend when it expressed inconsistent between two period. In 1980, 35% and 14% of residents’budget went to Higher Education and Health and human resources correspondingly. The annual of expenditure in Health and human resources in 1990 ( 20%) was twice that in 2000(10%) while the outlay of Higher Education on this ares in 1990 and 2000 was 45% and 40% respectively. Actually, the expenses on Transportation was 16% and 6% in 1980 and 1990, but it rose to 22% in 2000.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re in Health and human resources in 1990 20% was twice that in 200010% while the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, however, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23265306122 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25103001651 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9800841481 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10810655754 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501835704616 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696712454203 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091104676734 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939649611408 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re in Health and human resources in 1990 20% was twice that in 200010% while the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, however, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23265306122 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25103001651 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9800841481 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10810655754 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501835704616 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696712454203 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091104676734 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939649611408 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.