The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2000.
The presented three circular layouts showcase the information about the changes of five total expenditure in the UK school in the three different years: 1981,1991and 2001. Collaboration of data was done in per centum, and which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is evident that teachers salries was the significant part in all three years. However, it was followed by other workers salaries which plummted, while insurance experienced rose in the given time period.
It is crystal clear from the given charts, teacher salaries showed an increment of total 5% in the year 1981 and 1991but, went down at 40% in year 2001. Insurance made up the smallest part of the charts which comprises of 2%, 3% and 8% with inclination in the years 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.
Furniture and equipment witnessed a sharp fall of 10% in first ten years accounted for 15% and 5%, and then surged to under a quarter in 2001. Amongest the five spendings, not only other workers salaries but also resources contributed the most amount in both years:1981 and 1991 whereas in year 2001 both were marginally dropped at 15% and 9%.
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and homemade food in years 1970 1980 1990 and 2000. 67
- The table shows the proportion s of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 56
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 61
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in Euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...p the smallest part of the charts which comprises of 2%, 3% and 8% with inclination in the y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and equipment witnessed a sharp fall of 10% in first ten years accounted for 15%...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in first ten years accounted for 15% and 5%, and then surged to under a quarter i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00526315789 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74926834891 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8189513771 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14997603511 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617888792528 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696303786476 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880204423591 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586025073328 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.