The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given layout highlights the information about the changes in annual spending through particular in UK School during the three different years : 1981, 1991 and 2001. The data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that, In the year 1981 total School spending 2% insurance, and secondly teacher salaries had been 14% spended. Moreover, other workers salaries was 28% spending. Nextly, 15% spending had resources e.g books. Furthermore, the furniture and equipment was spending 15%, and after ten year (1991). There were 2% spending in insurance. Nextly, teacher salaries 15% total spended in school. However, The furniture and equipment was total spended 5%, and resources e.g books had been 20% full spending. Lastly, and Other workers salaries had 22% in school spending.
As far as trend was concerned, In the year 2001 total school was spending 8% in insurance. Moreover, teacher salaries head 45% total spending in school. Nextly, furniture and equipment was spended 23%, resources e.g books had been 9% spending. However, The Other workers salaries had 15%.
Overall, during the year 1981, 1991 and 2001 had been up to most schools pending teacher salaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The three Pie Charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 67
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperature and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
- Nowadays, people throw away old things and adapt new things.do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26203208556 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5519278788 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491978609626 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2849218761 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.6 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4666666667 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247507555561 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962449130157 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105933108382 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207096244058 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116777008327 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.