The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Somewhere in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Somewhere in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The three pie chart above gives information about the changes in per year expending by local authorities in somewhere in several decades.

Generally, it is certain that the proportion of higher education dominants in each three charts, showing that authorities most concern think was that. However, environmental services account for just within 10 percent. From 1980 to 1990, figures for higher education, at exactly 35%, grow into 45% which is the highest for all spending. However, it experience little drop in 2000 but it had been highest amount of proportion during that time.

As we can see k-12 education was the second highest percentage in each per pie too. Also, it have modified a several time, beginning 1980. Interestingly, amount of health and transportation was the quite low, fluctuating within 25% while other barely made up 10 percent

Overall, it is certain that local authorities much more consider about education rather than transportation, environmental services and even health and human resources.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-18 Enkhamgalan 84 view
Essays by user Enkhamgalan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'experiences'?
Suggestion: experiences
...e highest for all spending. However, it experience little drop in 2000 but it had been hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'been the highest'.
Suggestion: been the highest
...perience little drop in 2000 but it had been highest amount of proportion during that time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...unt of proportion during that time. As we can see k-12 education was the secon...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ercentage in each per pie too. Also, it have modified a several time, beginning 1980...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...h per pie too. Also, it have modified a several time, beginning 1980. Interestingly, amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and even health and human resources.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42236024845 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92758162205 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689440993789 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0606554515 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159667646537 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661710852074 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766406550063 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106863124026 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903352051227 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.