The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, the quantities of money on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the three years while those on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend.
As we can see from the first group, there was an increase in the expenditure on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment in the twenty years. Two decades witnessed a huge rise in the spending on insurance, increasing from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001, a fourfold rise. Meanwhile, the amount of money on teachers’ salaries went up to 45% from 40%. Also, the expense on furniture climbed to 23% from 15%, with a great dip at 5% in 1991. Although the money on teachers’ salaries was always far more than that on insurance, the latter reflected a greater growth rate.

However, the situation in the second group was just opposite. In other words, the amount of money on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books experienced a decrease over the period of twenty years, from 28% to 15% and from 15% to 9% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Sandhu param 73 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 73 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 67 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years of 1981, 1991, and 2001. Overall, the quantities of money on teachers&apos...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, e.g., first, however, second, so, while, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99014778325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96700615618 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566502463054 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0564572349 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147422239825 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677519291076 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123344460961 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106126120903 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113028011783 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.