The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015.
The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took/attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took/attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took/attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took/attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the proportion of learners who studied took/attended evening classes was higher than that of online and overseas students.
In country A, evening classes accounted for 70% and 67%, while online classes online learning made up just 5% and 10% in 2010 and 2015 respectively. Similarly, in country B, the figures for evening classes was the highest, decreasing from 72% to 48%. The proportion of students who took online classes increased from 8% to 32% throughout this period. Interestingly, overseas study remained unchanged at 20%. In country C, almost all learners were not interested in studying abroad, rising from 0% to only 3%, whereas online learning increased slightly from 6% to 15% between 2010 and 2015, compared to 94% and 82% for evening classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-29 | hungnguyen123 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | hungnguyen123 | view | |
| 2021-01-29 | hungnguyen123 | view | |
| 2021-01-29 | hungnguyen123 | view |
- The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015 61
- On the one hand some scientists predict that modern machines will increase the unemployment rate substantially 89
- Admittedly it is often argued that increasing the severity of penalties will cause most drivers to conform with traffic laws 92
- I think that people should be permitted to use as much water as they want and that the government should not strictly control the supply of this precious commodity 70
- The diagram illustrates how to make coffee Overall there are 12 stages in the coffee manufacturing process beginning with how coffee beans are produced and ending at the packing stage 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015. Overall, it can be seen clearly that the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an that of online and overseas students. In country A, evening classes accounted ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 3.15609756098 539% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35742971888 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25159868151 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393574297189 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 393.521231956 43.030603864 915% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 266.8 112.824112599 236% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.8 22.9334400587 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176319360016 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566366358782 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694031118108 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361188915301 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.451906267865 0.0819641961636 551% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.7 13.2329268293 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 10.3012195122 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.7 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.