The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world.
The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world. Some people take the position that it intrudes on human privacy. Although I partly agree with this assertion, I believe that the advantages of reinforcing security by means of video cameras outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, the principal reason why many people do not advocate the mass installation of surveillance cameras is that they are not accustomed to being monitored all the time by these devices. For some individuals, this surveillance is redundant and often cause them to be uncomfortable. These people claim that their individual freedom is invaded although they are not suspects. For example, when they are walking down the street, at bus stations or hanging out with their loved ones, the feeling of being observed have an inclination to make them become embarrassed and sometimes irritated. As a result, many believe camera surveillance is inadvisable and privacy is one of the most important rights which must be respected in this civilised world.
On the other hand, I personally believe that surveillance cameras bring more benefits to human life than disadvantages they create. Needless to say, widespread observation in public areas will make a huge contribution to the reduction of crime rates. In plain terms, when knowing that all their movements are under surveillance, people will not have the intention to engage in unlawful conduct. For instance, drivers will be more likely to conform with traffic rules such as not exceeding the speed limit or not driving through a red light when being conscious of the fact that their traffic offences are being recorded by video cameras. Therefore, the extensive installation of video cameras is crucial, especially in metropolises where there are a large number of inhabitants, workers and tourists.
According to the above analysis, although the utilisation of camera systems will certainly in part invade individual freedom, I hold the view that it is still of importance and will only benefit society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | hungnguyen123 | 78 | view |
- contention is well grounded and it is necessary to analyze the driving force behind this predisposition 84
- As a result many believe camera surveillance is inadvisable and privacy is one of the most important rights which must be respected in this civilised world 78
- The table illustrates how many travelers visited six World Heritage sites in Australia every 2 years from 1996 to 2000
- In conclusion I believe that governments should ensure that all citizens have sufficient access to fresh water and price it or allow it to be priced according to supply and demand 70
- I think that people should be permitted to use as much water as they want and that the government should not strictly control the supply of this precious commodity 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ecially in metropolises where there are a large number of inhabitants, workers and tourists. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27299703264 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91166124794 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566765578635 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9429071804 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28290209171 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114392324758 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249793050671 0.0667982634062 374% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190588001351 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19659349967 0.056905535591 345% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.