The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts illustrate the percentage of four kinds of transport in the UK in three different years. Looking from an overall perspective, private cars take up the majority part in all the concerning years, while the recreational vehicles are always the smallest part.
From 1965 to 1985, there are two major changes in the proportions of different vehicles. As for the vehicles owned by the individuals, the percentage grows from 40% to 55%. In contrast, the proportion of the recreational transport shrinks from 15% to only 5%. The percentage for commercial vehicles remains unchanged during this period, while the public transport slightly drops from 25% to 20%.
Compared with 1985, the spread of different kinds of transport experiences dramatically changes. One of the most obvious features is that transport for commercial usage is shrinking drastically, from 20% to 10%. Meanwhile, the private cars claim 60% of all types of transport. Both the percentages of public transport and recreation vehicles grow 2-3%.
In conclusion, as the years go by, the preference of transportation for people in UK keep changing.
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over the Antarctic and the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Why is this happening Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the drawbacks 61
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 73
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, as for, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33519553073 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02792265351 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5647996876 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8181818182 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123069819683 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556622690366 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519974389429 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075501886176 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317054981916 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.