Today, TV channels broadcast man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal showtime for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is true that man’s sport shows are more popular in TV channel than women’s sport shows. There could be several reasons why this is the casefor this trend, and I claim that TV channels should balance two types of sport shows.
There are various reasons why many TV channel broadcast man’s sport shows more than woman’s sport shows. Firstly, the sport shows have the attendance of men areGranted, the sport shows have the attendance of men which is more interesting and thrilling, especially football. The rate of audience watched watching men football competitions is considerably higher than that of women, because of the fact that men possess speed and skills which are more outstanding than women. Another reason rationale why TV channel choose to broadcast man’s sport shows is that men is the main audience of thismost TV channels are males, meanwhile, women tend to watch movie or music instead of sport shows. Therefore, they will prioritize programs which have relatively high watching rate.
In my view, TV channels should balance show-time for women’s sport and men’s sport. In spite of the fact that there areis no many women watched watching sport shows, the frequent schedule of them broadcasted on TV channels will enhance the rate of women choosing to watchfemale watching. It exerts positive effects on society social health due to encouragement and inspiration to people joined joining in exercises. Furthermore to maintain gender equality, women should have the same show-time of shows on TV channels, despite the low audience attraction. Vietnam, for example, has seen an equal sharing between women’s and men’s football shows on TV channel, which are supported by government and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | viviannguyen | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations 73
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 61
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- The table below gives information about values of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...considerably higher than that of women, because of the fact that men possess speed and skills which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
.... In spite of the fact that there areis no many women watched watching sport shows...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... to people joined joining in exercises. Furthermore to maintain gender equality, women shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, while, for example, in my view, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25270758123 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62809933681 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.498751543 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.666418934068 0.215688989381 309% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.300477461038 0.103423049105 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20960379859 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.51513202866 0.15604864568 330% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015258319875 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.