It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development?
In the contemporary world, the number of travel trips relentlessly surges due to affordable services and smooth governmental regulations. Although this phenomenon may bring insignificant drawbacks to indigenous culture and environment, I firmly maintain that it positively facilitates the development of countries’ economies and literature.
On the one hand, accumulating evidence from science suggests that traveling has an unexpected influence on individuals’ mental and physical improvement to some extent. Through their trips to other countries, tourists are able to broaden their horizons, experience indigenous people’s activities, and enjoy distinct cultural features in various regions worldwide. As a result, their awareness of cultural conservation is nurtured, leading to their appreciation for the identity of each country and curtailing severe racism in several areas.
Beside the aforementioned advantages, it is undeniable that the countries’ economies benefit from the proliferation of travel. In some developing countries, governments gain enormous capital from tourism so as to invest in further aspects such as free education or health care for local people. Owing to the invasion of international companies in the tourism field, the unemployment rate has considerably reduced, which plays a vital role in fostering local individuals’ living standards. Additionally, infrastructure and facilities that serve tourists are also accessible to citizens, attracting immigration from other countries so as to nurture their workforce.
In conclusion, while some worry about the disadvantages of global tourism, I strongly assert that this potential trend should be promoted by official organizations and individuals, owing to their benefits to personal development and countries’ economic advancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
| 2017-02-22 | Yolanda Wang | 87 | view |
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods rice wheat and maize by people in four different countries 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The diagram below shows how drinking water is produced using a solar powered water pump and water filter Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 72
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ents gain enormous capital from tourism so as to invest in further aspects such as free ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...acting immigration from other countries so as to nurture their workforce. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20866141732 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46468548473 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669291338583 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7479251115 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.7 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165504515332 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060022603486 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272428288295 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926009085789 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289049917689 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.03 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.71 8.58950901804 136% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.