Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days. The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners.
How far do you agree or disagree with this view?
With a common view to judging the students' quality, nations have different ways to approach the issues. However, examinations deem to be emphasized heavily, leading to limitations for teachers and exceeding pressure on young pupils. Personally, I totally agree with this statement and an explanation would be given in this essay
With regards to teachers, testing methodology plays a considerable role in their work, nevertheless, this puts restrictions as well as pressure on teachers. People can hardly find out a better assessment than through examining students, which gives frank and objective results. Nonetheless, examinations bring the teachers a lot of restrictions including building the tests and marking them, which is the problem of heavier workload along with higher pressure. For instance, in most Vietnamese schools, each class has lots of students, meaning that teachers have an equal number of assignments to gauge. What’s more, focusing on examinations set a limitation on teaching methodology applied in a limited number of lecturers. In other words, teachers are forced to build up their lessons surrounding testing skills and based knowledge rather than activities incentivizing students exploring themselves.
Furthermore, students, particularly young ones, are worse affected by the enormous quantity of tests during school time. No sooner do children start attending primary schools than they have to struggle with various tests evenly. Having crammed with many a subject and different types of examinations, it is not overstated that studying turns out to be a burden for kids to bear that may result in kids’ depression and physical deterioration.
Overall, nobody can deny that tests and examinations play a very important role in the betterment of any education system. However, governments and schools should take advantage of the method of an appropriate level to balance its pros and cons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-30 | viethung123 | 89 | view |
- The table below gives information about the past and projected figures in various countries for different years 78
- The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 78
- The chart below shows the different type of goods and services purchased online in Australia Canada and the United Kingdom last year 84
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will the effect if children are not taught history 56
- People are likely to be a self employment 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 965.302439024 170% => OK
No of words: 294.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56802721088 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04222562421 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 106.607317073 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656462585034 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8932270927 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238127710569 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747823991044 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504049194662 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129521207433 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490990190487 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 40.7170731707 241% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.