Topic: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. The second graph shows the percentage of trains running on time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first graph illustrates how many passengers travelling by train between 2000 and 2009, while the second one gives information about the proportion of trains operating timely as scheduled.
In general, it is apparent that the number of train travelers underwent a considerable fluctuation throughout the examination period. However, until the end of the period, there was a positive trend in the number of train passengers. Except for the years from 2004 to 2006, almost all train schedules ran punctually. Although the punctuality target remained unchanged, it was either achieved or exceeded only from 2002 to 2005 and again during the last two year.
Looking at the first graph, approximately 40 billion passengers selected train as their transportation in 2000, and this trend witnessed a constant increase in the next two years before declining back same as the first mentioned year. Between 2003 and 2005, there was a sustainable recovery in the number of train passengers to reach roughly at 50 billion before undergoing a serious crisis until 2008. Noticeably, at the end of the mentioned period, it showed a positive sign, standing merely 45 billion passengers.
Regarding the ratio of running trains on time, the punctuality goal was consistently set at 95%. The percentage of trains being punctual, meanwhile, increased considerably from 92% initially to 96% around 4 years later, followed by a substantial fall to the former level in 2005. Thereafter, the figure soared to a high of 97% in 2008 before leveling off toward the end of the time frame.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Topic Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
- Topic The chart below shows the percentages of five kinds of magazines sold by a company in the UK between 2001 and 2009 73
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, regarding, second, so, while, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92305250839 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4561817887 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289500881963 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101582150291 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751810465051 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181027749626 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753556149918 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, regarding, second, so, while, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92305250839 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4561817887 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289500881963 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101582150291 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751810465051 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181027749626 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753556149918 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.