The line graph illustrates the quantity of questions that one particular Tourist Information Office received through different ways: direct communication, letter/email and telephone during the first six months of 2011.
Overall, the enquiries received via direct communication and telephone increased significantly over the period, while the number of corresponding questions saw a considerable decline.
At the beginning of the span enquiries in person made up the lowest figure, at under 400, among the three channels. However, it rocketed dramatically, exceeding the number of questions by letter/email in March and by telephone in April and reaching approximately 1900 in the end of the period. The quantity of questions by telephone, on the contrary, was the highest, at about 900 in January, but then experienced some fluctuations and picked at 1600 in June, which was lower at around 300 enquiries than questions asked directly.
The number of enquiries by letter/email accounted under 800 in January. It fell slightly in February and remained steady until March, then it saw a dramatic decrease over the next two months and hits its lowest point at just under 400 enquiries, declining by half. In the last month of the timescale it reached a plateau.
- Topic The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002 It includes those with a degree whose with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications 52
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47474747475 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10477513023 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.864934582 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138712261039 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062814562528 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722752287385 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104225222358 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820711631767 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.