The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The bar chart illustrates average annual GDP growth in wealthy countries, globalisers and non-globalisers from 1960s to 1990s.
Overall, development of domestic products in countries that have adopted a global approach to business increased dramatically, while in wealthy countries it declined. Non-globalisers also saw a decrease in GDP after some fluctuation rate.
The average growth in domestic products made up nearly 5.0% in developed countries in 1960s, which was the highest figure among three types of countries. However, it experienced a downward trend at the end of the timescale. The percentage of goods and services produced within a country's borders in non-globalisers accounted for nearly 2.5% of the total in the 1960s. In the 1970s it increased to just over 3.0 per cent, but the percentage plunged considerably over the next decade and hit its lowest amount at slightly below of 1.0%. In the 1990s it grew gently to just over of 1.0%.
In 1960s the rate of average growth in domestic products was slightly above of 1.0%. It rose dramatically over the given period and reached a peak at around 5.0% in 1990s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | GulmiraKusajynkyzy | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 56 | view |
- Topic The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 78
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age group Iin2002 It includes those with a degree whose with a higher degree postgraduate and those with other qualifications 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...e up nearly 5.0% in developed countries in 1960s, which was the highest figure among thr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...it grew gently to just over of 1.0%. In 1960s the rate of average growth in dom...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1960s'.
Suggestion: In the 1960s
...it grew gently to just over of 1.0%. In 1960s the rate of average growth in domestic ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...eriod and reached a peak at around 5.0% in 1990s.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17934782609 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99731586761 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9810671613 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310525395116 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108701274792 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149111782955 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183401133864 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106423959755 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.