The total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002
The graph illustrates about the total amount of minutes of telephone calls in the UK along seven years from 1995 to 2002. There were three categories will be figured out specifically local, national and international fixed line, and mobile calls which are measured in billions. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement trend happened to be in mobiles calls over the seven years thoroughly.
Regarding to the data, in 1995 initially, most of people was using the local fixed lines which was counted at 73 billions minutes. The trend was fluctuating along the seven years. Besides, it tend to remain due to its stability which still maintain the same level with the first year’s amount after the seven years shown markedly.
Unlike with the case above, the most sharply increased call usage had to be in mobiles calls category which started from 4 billions at the beginning then it was increasing gradually about ten times higher in 2002 dramatically. It was followed by the national and international fixed lines which noted at 37 billions approximately and then reached a peak 60 billions at the end of the seven years incrementally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | rchauhan.micro | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school 73
- Rail transport in four countries in 2007 67
- Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the projections for 2050 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...garding to the data, in 1995 initially, most of people was using the local fixed lines which w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...ting along the seven years. Besides, it tend to remain due to its stability which st...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0103626943 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70272695864 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59585492228 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4045452411 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192468513215 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922428327221 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117308437253 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132679818001 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809256514853 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.