The chart below shows the total number of minutes ( in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart below provides information about the time that people spent on telephone calls in the UK, divided into three kinds of genres, during the period of eight years from 1995 to 2002.
As can be seen, the time of two categories that people spent on calling rose steadily each year, expect the local-fixed line which rose from 1995 to 1999 then decreased in the remaining period. Time figures for the local-fixed line were the highest than the two other categories at all period.
During the period of five years from 1995, used time of local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line and mobiles rose from 72, 38 and 3 to 90, 50 and 13 billion minutes respectively. Over the last three years of the period, the figure for the two remaining categories reached peaks of 61 and 45 billion minutes respectively. By contrast, the figure for the local-fixed line decreased to its lowest point, at 71 billion minutes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in many countries. What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? 56
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in many countries. What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? 67
- Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes ( in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The illustration shows a bicycle which is an environmentally friendly vehicle Describe this vehicle and its environmentally friendly feature 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87421383648 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7422970354 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4423964344 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21954222667 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118134328351 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12375690188 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187994739096 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139656490838 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.