town of Hillingford between 2000 and 2015
The maps illustrates both the old town and the current changes in Wallingford, that have been done in the period from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, the city underwent a complete transformation with replacement some settings, demolishment others as well as adding some buildings to a residential area. Evidently, not only these mentioned changes were done, but also the west of the main road has seen a significant building up, cutting down all trees.
Ar first, over the period the neighbourhood west of Wallingford seen cutting down the wood fields to build here a lively residential area with flats, tennis courts, playground and restaurants. To the north and north-east there now could be found housings and train station, respectively.
While some settings were not changed, remaining the same, as a school in the north-east part of the Wallingford, repurposing also took place. Therefore, country house in the north is now hotel and housing in the south-east to the studying facility is bed and breakfast. Meanwhile, the significant transformation with main road along the cost was also done, it has become more extended by the year 2015. Similarly, the market has been enlarged to a supermarket in the south-east part of the town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | koinoyokan | 92 | view |
- The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
- The chart show the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 78
- construct new buildings rather than wasting money on maintaining old ones 79
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of outokumpu companies in euros between january 2006 and december 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The maps illustrates both the old town and the current chang...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt building up, cutting down all trees. Ar first, over the period the neighbourh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21393034826 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00546106578 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3905166531 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873657938905 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402812543154 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070110379149 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702613954426 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900611072616 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.