The two maps below shoe road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The following pictures give illustration about the changes of a road which led to an urban hospital after 3 years from 2007.
Generally, many facilities such as the car park experienced modifications while the others tended to disappear due to some replacements.
A closer look at the maps reveals that until 2010, two ranges of bus stops located on both sides of the Hospital road were grouped into one bus station in the South-West area of the hospital. One more noticeable feature was the appearance of the new car park used for public to the East of the hospital while the previous one belonged to just staff only.
Furthermore, we can also realize the existence of two roundabouts in the second map. One located in the intersection of two roads whereas the other was in front of the city hospital and both of them led to the bus station. After all, the Ring road which encompassed the hospital still remained during the 3-year period.
- At present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and give you 73
- The map below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, second, so, still, whereas, while, after all, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76219512195 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66487134067 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628048780488 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9597601011 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162349902799 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730151161143 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435198207227 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877628376044 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05682537358 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.