The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate the changes in infrastructure for tourism purpose.
Overall, it is clear that the significant changes made the island become more modernized with a new transport system and accommodation areas.
Looking at the maps to more details, before the development, the island was occupied by some trees dotted in the west and east. After developed, accommodation buildings have been constructed and organized along a circular footpath. there was another footpath connecting the accommodation area in the west of the island to the beach. while the beach remains as it was, the area surrounding was designated as a swimming area.
A reception building was located in the heart of 2 accommodation areas and surrounded by a vehicle track. while a restaurant was sited in the north, there was a pier constructed in the south of the island to give access to the island by boats. The restaurant and the pier have been linked to the reception building by 2 small vehicle tracks
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | minhthanh211 | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | HANGUYEN93 | 56 | view |
- the pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- the pie charts below show the methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 74
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...nd organized along a circular footpath. there was another footpath connecting the acc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...in the west of the island to the beach. while the beach remains as it was, the area s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...reas and surrounded by a vehicle track. while a restaurant was sited in the north, t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile a restaurant was sited in the north, there was a pier constructed in the sout...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05521472393 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01326311517 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0089768442 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967198729099 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431273507338 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407921218115 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053925861344 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263302073713 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.