The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The diagram provided here shows a comparative illustration of an island before and post development.
As the map show, this island was just a piece of land with few trees on eastern side and a beach in the westernmost boundary of it. But post development, a lot of changes can be seen that boost its beauty and emphasized on its tourist activities.
In order to create tourist hub, the area is well utilized and an additional Pier is linked with the island for its easy communication with the help of ferries. The major facilities like accommodation, restaurants and food corners are developed to enhance the comfort of visitors. Different cottages are setup with interconnecting footpaths. Restaurants are rightly placed at the centers considering its easy approach from all corners. Moreover, vehicle tracks are also developed all across the island. The main attraction of the island is the beach area with swimming and other water activities.
Thus, after all these investments, the island is converted into a refreshing holiday spot where one can come around and enjoy the weekend trips with their loved ones.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, after all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01092896175 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82254058358 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 183.0 22.4926829268 814% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 917.0 112.824112599 813% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 183.0 22.9334400587 798% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 50.0 5.23603664747 955% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149295927385 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149295927385 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964210331345 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318033428841 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 93.7 13.2329268293 708% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -114.27 61.2550243902 -187% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 74.7 10.3012195122 725% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.96 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.51 8.06136585366 205% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 11.4329268293 551% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 75.2 10.9970731707 684% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.