The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps compare a small island before and after the developments carried out for tourism purposes.
Overall, there were various added facilities after the development of tourism, and a pier was constructed to permit access to the island by boat.
The island was originally completely undeveloped. A number of trees occupied in the middle-east and the middle-west of the island.
After tourist facilities are constructed, the island has changed significantly. In the central part of the island, two separate accommodation areas were built, consisting of simple huts arranged around a circular footpath. A reception area and restaurant were located in the middle of these two areas. In addition, the footpaths in the west guide tourists to the shore where a new swimming area is built, taking advantage of the beach. Turning to some broadened changes, a new pier was set to the south of the island, allowed sailboat to anchor. Nevertheless, the area of this island is unchangeable throughout this period, at around 250 meters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0034323799 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7827131068 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19955234593 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806101452039 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053999678095 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116934567343 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357255111525 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.