The presented map illustrates the differences between before and after of the island with new constructions.
As is observed, the island was upgraded with many facilities to provide for the tourism and commercial possibilities.
Before being repaired, the island was an empty area that was surrounded by the sea with just some trees and a beach to the west. After that, a new pier was added to help the tourists transport and visit the island. The island was separated and divided into smaller zones, which were bordered by footpaths. In the center of the map, there was a reception for welcome guests that was surrounded by the vehicle track.
Looking at the uppermost, a new restaurant was constructed right above the reception. A lot of accommodations were constructed around each small zone, in the right and left of the reception. Adjacent to the beach, the swimming area was also added for the tourists while the beach and the right part of the island still remained stable.
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 56
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 95
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problem and instead of increase funding into urgent and more threatening issue such as global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden 84
- The flow charts shows the production of cement and concrete 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93975903614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77689281237 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.7794213613 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228810577832 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962435331012 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586929627467 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141905591035 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05320688155 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.