The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following maps illustrate how an island was changed between the construction of some facilities for tourist before and after.

Overall, it is clear that an island changed a lot since before, while the area was still unchanged.

Turning to an island in before, it still was a large area with some trees. An island was surrounded by sea. However, there still was the beach in the left of the island.

Regarding the island after transforming, there was many equipments was built for tourist. Specifically, to entry the island in now, there are a pier was constructed. Footpath and vehicle track are built respectively, and many accomodations surround two kinds of road types. Straight form the pier is the reception, behind the reception is the restaurant, and it is matched with the front desk by vehicle track. Lastly, the beach is matched with acommodations by the footpath, and in the beach zone, it has the place for swimming.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-08 Mekata view
2023-07-27 teulimin.06 61 view
2023-06-25 lydia231232 78 view
2023-03-24 appollo abu 73 view
2023-02-19 Trịnh Trí Dũng 84 view
Essays by user unknownabc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 145, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'piers'?
Suggestion: piers
...to entry the island in now, there are a pier was constructed. Footpath and vehicle t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, regarding, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81041166304 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7213280963 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179149816095 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822829221329 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879971900649 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141923502585 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105296601534 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 145, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'piers'?
Suggestion: piers
...to entry the island in now, there are a pier was constructed. Footpath and vehicle t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, regarding, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81041166304 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7213280963 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179149816095 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822829221329 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879971900649 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141923502585 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105296601534 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.