Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
A tremendous amount of time and financial support is thought to be spent on the preservation of wild animals. In my opinion, I completely agree with these statements for the following reasons.
Turning to the past, humans and animals lived together thousand years ago, but nowadays, humans devastate nature, especially the environment of wild animals. In the last decade, few wild animals did not exist any more by the construction of humans. For example, a bird species named Dodo lived peacefully in Madagascar, until the approach of people. They killed them all for storing food. Additionally, the last white rhino being male was passed away in 2018, and the white rhino is only 2 females and they will die soon, and also many wild animals are in danger of extinction. If one kind of animal was not available, the ecosystem would be affected seriously. Thus, people have to cease destroying the environment. Instead, they should be aware of the risk immediately.
For the solutions for conservation of wild animals, it was occurring in around the world but it was still slower than the destruction of humans. People should stop using belongings like clothes, bags and jewelry and also, people still be superstitious about some kinds of animals like rhino, bears to modulate medicines. In addition, local people also should learn not to hunt and protect them from hunters. Government should establish some helping animal centers with high-educated experts for animal escaping from hunters, taking care of them when they have injuries or they are parentless for them to have a better life with their fellow outsiders.
In conclusion, it is essential for humans to spend time and financial resources for rescuing wild animals from extinction. It is better than just destroying ecosystems and humans will pass away when all of the species in the entire world die.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-13 | unknownabc | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | unknownabc | 44 | view |
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Everyday millions of tons food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening An how can we solve this problem 53
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people believe that the government should support the funds for arts while some other people suggest that money should be used for public health and education Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...osystems and humans will pass away when all of the species in the entire world die.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11074918567 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71618662643 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57003257329 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1466132505 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177614717106 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573538388409 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457670488248 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121504195701 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556999162427 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.