The maps provide a comparison of the state of an island before and after the erection of some visitor facilities.
Overall, the island has changed considerably with the introduction of tourism. Four main new features can be seen in the second diagram that involves the building of a restaurant, reception accommodation, pier, and some insignificant modification.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see in the first map there was a primitive island covered by trees. By contrast, tourists can access the island by boat easily now thanks to the construction of a pier. A restaurant is behind a reception, built in the center of the island, and both are accessed via vehicle track. Meanwhile, the hosing areas are only reachable by footpath, situated on either side of the reception.
Furthermore, a beach in the west of the island is upgraded for swimming activities. Tourists can walk along the footpath from the accommodation area to here. Notably, there is a part of the island in the east that hasn't been reclaimed yet.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 84
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 84
- The two maps below show the Paradise island in the past and in the present 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...s a part of the island in the east that hasnt been reclaimed yet.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95977011494 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9865875807 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2733705489 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138273019675 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538695639139 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394109286515 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826040184616 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301978834196 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.