The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps provided describes the roads system leading to a city hospital in 2007, and after changes in 2010.
Overall, what stand out from the maps is that several noticeable modifications had been made changing the structure of a road, adding and removing some buildings.
Looking at the details, it can be seen that in 2007, there were three bus stops which would have been removed till 2010 located both near the left and right hand sides of Hospital Road joining the south side of Ring Road around City Hospital. Another remarkable development was dividing staff and public car park situated near the left hand side of Hospital Road into two separate parts and changing the place of public one to near the east of Ring Road.
Finally, it can also be noticed that the structure of Hospital Road had been modernized constructing two roundabouts joining to the new Bus station located in the left hand side of Hospital Road, in both junctions with Ring Road and City Road.
- Some people think that to be successful you need to get in university education whereas others say it is not true Discuss both ideas and give your own opinion 61
- The most common solution for criminal behaviour is prison but many believe education is a better method To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The process below describes the chewing gum production. 56
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 73
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government should pay for some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
The maps provided describes the roads system leading to a city hospital in 20...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8224852071 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36661241267 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1190943897 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328771697449 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203303004139 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104929612114 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227957767669 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107424580151 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.