The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The given maps illustrate the modifications that were made to a city hospital’s transport infrastructure in the 2007-2010 period.
Overall, it is apparent that there were some significant differences between the two layouts. These involved the intersection upgrade and the construction of bus and parking facilities.
The most striking change was the appearance of the two new roundabouts. While the first one was erected at the three-way junction of Ring Road and Hospital Road, the other one was built at the southern end of Hospital Road. The main hospital building, which was encircled by Ring Road, remained unaltered throughout the period.
Bus system and parking spaces also underwent some radical changes. In 2007, there were 3 bus stops on either side of Hospital Road. Three years later, these were obliterated to make way for a large bus station connected with the roundabouts. The parking area, which was once accessed by both the members of public and the staff, was later on separated as an exclusive public car park was added to the east side of Ring Road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
... radical changes. In 2007, there were 3 bus stops on either side of Hospital Road. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12994350282 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81093744831 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6427346141 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245390887879 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919606624039 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907294697837 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149023261057 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908904455667 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.