The graphs compare the changes of roads and other facilities accessing to a city hospital between 2007 and 2010.
It is immediately apparent that significant changes can be seen in the junctions, which made it easier to access the hospital, and more useful facilities were constructed for the convenience of both staff and public.
In 2007, the city hospital was surrounded by Ring Rd, and the Hospital Rd connected on the south side of this road. In the eastern of Hospital road, there was a car park, using for both the hospital staffs and public. Several bus stops were set alongside of Hospital Rd. Other side of Hospital Rd was connected with an east-west City Rd.
Many considerable improvements can be seen in 2010 from the second map. Two roundabouts were constructed in the north and south ends of Hospital Rd. The eastern car park was rebuilt for the hospital staffs only, and a new area located on the east side of Ring Rd was built as public car park. Bus stops were all removed, replaced by a far more spacious bus station sited on the west side of Hospital Rd.
- The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The table shows the maximum minimum and average monthly salaries in a European country in five employment sector in 2009 74
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different ages who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- In multicultural societies, people of different cultural backgrounds live and work together. Do you think the advantages of multicultural societies outweigh the disadvantages ? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67015706806 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52936483468 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8033423294 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16214714714 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101934528626 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727061774978 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123017179547 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813626291543 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.