The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.
The given pie charts give the information about the percentage of goverments’ expenditures on different categories yearly in 1990 in Italy and Spain.
Generally, Italian and Spainese governments spent most on higher education, whereas environmental services and other were the least spending categories in the countries.
In 1990, higher education was always the greatest spending in Italy and Spain, at 35% and 45% respectively, much more higher than other catergories. K-12 education was ranked the second position in the total amount in both countries, at 25% in Italy, and at 20% in Spain. In Italy, health and human resources just made up 14%, slight lower than that in Spain, at 20%, which also ranked the second most spending.
In contrast, Environmental services and other were two catergories which two countries spent the least on. The former just accounted for 4% in Italy and 5% in Spain, the latter were around 4% compared to 6% in the other given. There was a huge different in the spending on transportation in Italy and Spain, with 16% and 6% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | dieulinh1310 | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 56
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...pain, at 35% and 45% respectively, much more higher than other catergories. K-12 education ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14124293785 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98209837559 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1301768805 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262568072638 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11107625646 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569391558966 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151408757668 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552650787879 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.