Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program.
Some people suppose that the school should force the children ro study about finance. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view.
There are some reasons why should providing the knowledge of finance in school. First, teaching about finance give the children a sense of money. As a result, they will become financially savvy who is intelligent and well-informed on the subject of money. In addition, through financial courses in school, the children will manage their pocket-money better.
However, I would side with the view which should not be a compulsory component of the school program. The main limitation of this is that the children are too yound in order to gain the knowledge about finance. This lead to they may feel bored and not focus on studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-22 | butterflyluo | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-22 | butterflyluo | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-22 | butterflyluo | 89 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 56
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990. 73
- Financial education should be a compulsory component of the school program. 22
- The two pie charts below show the amount of annual spending by governments in Italy and Spain in 1990.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ro) must be used with a third-person verb: 'studies'.
Suggestion: studies
...the school should force the children ro study about finance. In my opinion, I complet...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, well, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 648.0 1615.20841683 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 129.0 315.596192385 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37013600491 4.20363070211 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62622570901 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 176.041082164 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 506.74238477 38% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5858635422 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.0 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262150273418 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983422096596 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136343620334 0.0667982634062 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159233473349 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647183824623 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.